Get my best-selling book, Up from the Water!

FAITH-DRIVEN EXECUTIVE COACH & CAREER TRANSITION CONSULTANT

Why There Should Absolutely Be an “I” (and a “U”) in TEAM

Posted on: November 12, 2025
Author: Tanya Simpson
Tanya Simpson is a faith-driven executive coach and career transition consultant who guides seasoned leaders and high-potential professionals through strategic transitions and career advancement.

The familiar saying, “There is no ‘I’ in TEAM,” is intended to be a powerful call for selflessness and collaboration. However, in the context of high-performing corporate leadership, this saying is fundamentally flawed. It suggests that individuality is a liability, a trait that must be suppressed for the collective good. This view undermines the very structure of effective teamwork and overlooks a profound truth about how complex systems thrive. A team that asks its members to erase their distinct contributions is not a body operating in harmony, it is a group striving for a monotonous and ultimately less capable uniformity.

The Essential “I”: Unique Design for a Unified Body

The most compelling metaphor for a truly functioning team comes not from a business textbook but from the profound teaching found in scripture concerning the body of Christ. The Apostle Paul lays out this principle with crystal clarity in 1 Corinthians 12:14: “For the body does not consist of one member but of many.” This is not just a theological concept, it is a practical blueprint for organizational excellence.

Imagine for a moment what a human body would be like if it only consisted of one type of cell or one type of organ. If it were all eyes, it could see, but it could not walk or digest food. If it were all feet, it could move, but it could not reason or speak. The resulting creature would be monstrously imbalanced and utterly incapable of performing the complex task of living.

The same principle holds true in the corporate environment. Successful executive teams, high-stakes project groups, and entire organizations all require a diversity of functions. You need the visionary to chart the course, the detail-oriented analyst to ground the vision in reality, the eloquent communicator to articulate the strategy, and the steady implementer to ensure execution. Each of these roles demands a different set of gifts, talents, and temperaments. Each individual “I” must step into their unique role, not simply blend into the wallpaper. My “I” value is not in my ability to be exactly like the person next to me, it is in my ability to bring a distinct and necessary piece to the puzzle. This understanding moves beyond mere tolerance for difference, it celebrates the essential need for it.

The Fatal Flaw of Uniformity

Paul continues in verse 17: “If the whole body were an eye, where would be the sense of hearing? If the whole body were an ear, where would be the sense of smell?” These rhetorical questions highlight the absurdity of an organization built on replication instead of synergy. If every member of your executive team is a sales dynamo, your company may be excellent at closing deals, but it will likely suffer from poor financial controls or a lack of innovative product development. Conversely, if the team is overloaded with brilliant but cautious strategists, the company may have a perfect plan but fail to execute it with the necessary speed and fervor. The deficiency in a team comprised of all one type of person is not merely an absence of variety, it is a fatal weakness, where overrepresentation in one area creates massive vulnerability in another. The individual “I” is therefore not a problem to be solved, it is the essential unique ingredient, the specific cell type that allows each organ to function as it should and the whole body to thrive.

The Necessary “U”: Appreciating Complementary Gifts

Equally important to the uniqueness of the “I” is the necessity of the “U” in TEAM. Recognition of “U” means appreciating that others also bring their own uniquely valuable contribution. The moment “I” understand that my own unique ability is essential, I must immediately grant the same grace and respect to the unique ability of “U,” my colleague. I may be the brain, the strategy setter, or the conceptualizer, but without you as the hands, the implementer, the executer, my ideas remain purely theoretical and useless. My success is directly dependent on your distinct capability, and vice versa.

Paul addresses this interdependence directly in 1 Corinthians 12:21: “The eye cannot say to the hand, ‘I have no need of you,’ nor again the head to the feet, ‘I have no need of you.’” In a high-stakes corporate environment, this means recognizing that the CFO’s meticulous attention to detail is just as vital as the CEO’s charismatic leadership. It means the brilliance of the technical architect is as necessary as the patience of the client relationship manager. When I value the “U” in the team, I stop comparing my gifts to yours and instead focus on how my gifts complement yours.

Interdependence and the Danger of Internal Strife

This interdependence of “I” and “U” is the key to the purpose of the individual contribution of each. The goal of the “I” shining brightly is not individual glory or competitive advantage over “U.” The purpose of each member doing their best work is to support and build the whole team. When the liver performs its complex functions, its purpose is not to compete with or outshine the lungs, but to support the health of the entire organism. The true metric of success, then, is not how high any individual can climb alone, but how much each of our unique contributions elevate the performance of the entire team. When every member is operating in their sweet spot, their God-given design for their unique role, the team achieves a level of organic efficiency that no amount of forced conformity could ever produce. It is a system working with flow and power, not against friction and resistance.

The critical nature of this interdependence becomes most apparent when teams break down. Consider what happens to a human body suffering from an autoimmune disease. With autoimmune disease, the body’s own defense system, the immune response, mistakenly identifies healthy cells and tissue as foreign invaders and attacks them. The liver attacks the stomach, the skin attacks the joints, the body turns on itself. When a team operates in competition or mutual sabotage, the internal conflict is not caused by an external threat, but by a misdirected internal mechanism. The result is a profound and painful breakdown.

How might this parallel show up in your organization? When leaders hoard information to maintain power, when departments build silos to protect budgets, when one executive actively undermines another’s project to secure a promotion, that is the corporate equivalent of autoimmune disease. The energy and resources that should be focused on the external market, the new opportunity, or the complex challenge are instead consumed by internal self-sabotage. The corporate body becomes sick, weak, and incapable of thriving or even functioning properly. This internal strife is a betrayal of the team’s purpose, which is to collectively achieve something greater than any individual could achieve alone. Scripture warns against this kind of self-destruction with sobering words from Galatians 5:15: “But if you bite and devour one another, watch out that you are not consumed by one another.” A team consumed by internal strife is a team on the path to inevitable failure, and in some cases, even organizational death.

Stewardship: The Antidote to Internal Strife

The antidote to this is a deliberate leadership culture that honors the principle of the body, where both differentiation and interdependence are prized. Leadership must intentionally create space for the “I” to shine while reinforcing the critical bond with the “U”. This requires an act of intentional appreciation, where leaders frequently articulate the specific value of each unique contribution. It is not enough to simply say, “We are a team.” We must articulate, “We need the precision of the finance team to maximize the boldness of the marketing team.” This reinforces the complementary nature of the roles and elevates the work of each member beyond individual ambition to strive toward a collective calling.

Ultimately, embracing both the “I” and the “U” in TEAM is neither a license for arrogance nor a call to false humility. It is a mandate for stewardship. It is a responsibility to leverage the unique gifts entrusted to each member for the good of the whole. The Apostle Peter summarized this perfectly in 1 Peter 4:10: “As each has received a gift, use it to serve one another, as good stewards of God’s varied grace.” Embracing both the “I” and the “U” calls teams to a higher standard, a standard where we understand that each member’s personal excellence is not an end in itself, but a tool, a highly specialized part intended to fulfill a specific function in a magnificent system. Our goal is not to be a bland, homogenous unit. Our goal is to be a powerful, synergistic organism, a corporate body working in health and harmony. The health of the whole depends on the robust function of every unique part. That is the power of the “I” and the value of the “U” in every truly great TEAM.

If your team would like help leveraging individual strengths for collective success, I encourage you to check out my coaching page or connect with me directly. I’d love to walk with you!

Hit the subscribe button and join me in peeling back the layers of Radical Stewardship™ in upcoming issues of this blog!

SHARE YOUR

Comments

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *